This is a question that has arisen in my practice numerous times this year since “Portability” became permanent when the American Taxpayer Relief Act (ATRA) was signed in January 2013. And I’m sorry, but–the answer is “Maybe”.

The Way It Was

The majority of my clients want the surviving spouse to continue to be able to use all of the couple’s assets after the first spouse dies. In the not so distant past, when the Estate Tax Exemption (Exemption) was $600,000 (increasing to $1 million over a period of years), and estate tax rates were up to  55%, this was a real problem.  If clients with $2 million in assets provided for all assets to pass outright to the survivor, then when the survivor died owning the whole $2 million, there could be $500,000 of estate taxes to pay.  As a result, the vast majority of my clients who are married couples have an estate plan that creates a “Bypass Trust” when the first spouse dies, to bypass estate taxes.  The Bypass Trust will hold the deceased spouse’s assets, and use the deceased spouse’s Exemption.  The survivor is the beneficiary of the Bypass Trust but the assets in the Bypass Trust are not taxed when the survivor dies.  This allows the survivor to use all the assets during his or her lifetime, and to use the Exemption of both spouses; this approach essentially doubles the amount that can pass free of Estate Tax.

There has always been a potential downside to the use of the Bypass Trust, and that is: while the assets in the Bypass Trust escape Estate Tax at the death of the survivor, they also do not receive a new ”stepped up”  income tax basis at that time.  Because the Estate Tax was taxed at up to 55% versus capital gains at 20% (plus California capital gain taxes around 9+%), it was almost always better to avoid the Estate Tax and forgo the “stepped up” basis at the death of the survivor.  With the current Estate Tax rate of 40%, and California capital gain tax rates bumped up to 13.3%, this is not such an easy choice now.

Continue Reading Now that there is “Portability” of the Estate Tax Unified Credit, Do I Need a Bypass Trust?

I recently had the privilege of serving as one of the Sacramento Bee’s experts for the “Ask the Expert” column by Claudia Buck, Personal Finance columnist. The following Q & A, based on an answer I wrote that was posted online at www.sacbee.com/personalfinanceblog, deals with a topic that comes up regularly in my practice and may be a situation you have faced: how long, after the death of the settlor, can the assets remain in the trust before distribution to the trust beneficiaries must be made?

Q:  “Is there any harm in leaving a house titled in a trust name after a person is deceased? All other assets have been disbursed, the house is a rental and the rent is split evenly (after expenses) among the siblings, each claim the income and expenses on our individual tax returns, is that okay?”  

Continue Reading How Long Can Assets Remain in a Trust after the Death of the Settlor?

In my estate planning practice, I often have clients who wish to make gifts or bequests to children or other family members who are receiving public benefits without interfering with those benefits. This may be possible through the use of what is known as a Special Needs Trust. A Special Needs Trust allows funds to be set aside, in trust, for beneficiaries who are on public benefits without causing the beneficiary to lose his or her eligibility for those benefits. The funds held in the Special Needs Trust can then be used to supplement the beneficiary’s public benefits to provide a quality of life for the beneficiary that he or she would not otherwise enjoy.

When to Consider a Special Needs Trust 

Are the Public Benefits Needs-based?  Not all individuals receiving public benefits will lose eligibility for those benefits due to a gift or bequest – it all depends upon what type of public benefits the person is receiving. The key determination is whether the public benefits the individual is receiving are “needs-based.” Needs-based benefits are those public benefits that require that the recipient earn below a certain income and/or have less than a certain amount of assets in order to qualify for the benefits. Needs-based benefit programs include SSI, Medi-Cal (known as Medicaid outside of California), IHSS and others. All of those benefit programs have asset and income ceilings that a recipient must not exceed in order to qualify for the benefit. In contrast, social security and Medicare do not have maximum asset and income levels and therefore they are not considered needs-based programs.

Continue Reading Estate Planning for the Special Needs Beneficiary